<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Flipside with Robert R. Van Ryzin</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/SyndicationService.asmx/GetAtom" />
  <icon>favicon.ico</icon>
  <updated>2010-08-09T15:15:21.3997419-05:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>F+W Media, Inc.</name>
  </author>
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/</id>
  <generator uri="http://dasblog.info/" version="2.3.9074.18820">DasBlog</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Scowling British lion?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2010/08/09/ScowlingBritishLion.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,a72b2422-462a-4a87-bd3b-14a47ca2e8c9.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-08-09T15:03:29.492-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-08-09T15:15:21.3997419-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <img src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/images/MorganObv.jpg" alt="MorganObv.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="261" width="262" />
        <br />
        <div align="justify">OK. So George Morgan's initial "M" appears on the Morgan dollar
(1878-1921) in the curls of Liberty's hair. Some, not knowing the English engraver
who designed the new dollar, took the "M" to stand for "Mint." But how anyone, as
reported in the April 4, 1878 issue of the <i>Cincinnati Commercial Tribune</i>, could
have figured he hid a "scowling British lion" ... "in the abunda<a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl080910Z6242"><img src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/images/British_lion_and_Union_flag.jpg" alt="British_lion_and_Union_flag.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="141" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="220" /></a>nt
back hair with which [he] has embellished the head of Liberty" is beyond me. The <i>Tribune</i> quipped,
'What else this malevolent artist may have managed to crowd into the design, who dare
conjecture?" 
<br /><br />
I'm not seeing a lion in Liberty's hair--scowling or otherwise.<br /><br />
For more stories about U.S. coins and the designers whose works adorn them, pick up
a copy of my latest book, <i>Fascinating Facts, Mysteries &amp; Myths About U.S. Coins:<br /></i><a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl080910Z6242">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins</a><p></p><p><br /></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=a72b2422-462a-4a87-bd3b-14a47ca2e8c9" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Laugh out loud</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2010/07/25/LaughOutLoud.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,bf8e8307-3dd3-4873-9954-50d9a118ede6.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-07-25T16:34:33.358-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-07-26T16:50:53.6144166-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Apparently the following was a "good one"
back in 1869, as several newspapers picked it up:<br /><br />
"Why is a one dollar greenback better than a silver dollar? When you fold it you double
it, and when you open it you find it in creases."<br /><br />
Check out my new book, <i>Fascinating Facts, Mysteries and Myths About U.S. Coins</i>. <a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl072610Z6242">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins</a><p></p><p><br /></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=bf8e8307-3dd3-4873-9954-50d9a118ede6" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Knowledge shouldn't be avoided</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2010/07/22/KnowledgeShouldntBeAvoided.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,23599f93-3151-42ad-91b7-cd825a6f0e0b.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-07-22T13:27:24.478-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-07-22T13:33:45.897604-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div align="justify">I edit two magazines for coin collectors (<i>Coins</i> and <i>Coin
Prices</i>) and one for paper money collectors (<i>Bank Note Reporter</i>). As such,
in June I attended the International Paper Money Show in Memphis, Tenn. This year's
IPMS was the first to be run by Lyn Knight and show chairman Doug Davis. A major highlight
as far as I was concerned was the number of educational opportunities.<br /><br />
On Friday and Saturday of the show, experts from all areas of the currency field gave
delightful, illustrated presentations free for all to attend. With so many scheduled,
I couldn’t make it to all of them, but I did attend quite a few. 
<br /><br />
Leading into this show and aware of the wide range of educational opportunities being
offered (including several excellent programs at club meetings and an author’s forum),
we asked paper money collectors in a poll question whether or not they attend educational
forums at paper money shows. It was disappointing to see the results. Only 14 percent
checked “yes.” 
<br /><br />
If those figures are reflective of the hobby, it’s a shame. In the nearly 25 years
I’ve been with Krause Publications, I’ve attended hundreds of these presentations,
about paper money and coins, and I’m always intrigued by what other collectors have
learned and are willing to share. 
<br /><br />
Knowledge is the key to success in this hobby and those who pass by these opportunities
are making a mistake.<br /><br />
--------------------------------------<br /><br /><div align="justify">Want a book filled with interesting stories about U.S. coins,
check out my latest at www.ShopNumisMaster.com by clicking here: <a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl030810Z6242">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins</a><p></p><p><br /></p></div></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=23599f93-3151-42ad-91b7-cd825a6f0e0b" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An 1808 silver dollar?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2010/06/16/An1808SilverDollar.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,aaa6d3d5-1e78-48a1-8eac-7eaa41ec30d2.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-06-16T14:12:28.988-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-06-16T14:16:59.5545813-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Recently I was digging through some 19th-century
newspapers online to find references to U.S. coins. I ran into a number of stories
on the 1804 dollar, all of which varied as to their assessment of why this coin is
so rare as compared to others. 
<br /><br />
One of the most bizarre stories was in the Washington, D.C.,<i> Critic-Record</i> of
Dec. 17, 1888, about counterfeiters and the police pursuit of them. It was explained
that a centerpiece of the collection of Hamilton Dission, a wealthy Philadelphia saw
manufacturer, was “a silver dollar of 1804, during which year but six were turned
out from the United States mints.”<br />
 <br />
When his collection sold at auction, the newspaper reported, the coin brought $1,100.
However, before completing the purchase, the winning bidder took the coin to the Philadelphia
Mint to be checked for authenticity. There, Mint experts, who apparently weren’t versed
in U.S. coinage history, determined the coin to be an 1808, “which is quite common.”
A huckster, according to this fractured tale, had taken an 1808 dollar and punched
out the last 8 and plugged the hole with a 4.<br /><br />
“When this fact became known to the Numismatists’ Association it caused much alarm,
and circulars were sent out to all the members in the country. As a result it was
learned that eighty three members of the association believed themselves to be possessors
of these six valuable dollars.”<br /><br />
Eventually, authorities turned their attention to Pete McCarthy, a resident of the
Indiana State Prison North at Michigan City, and “one of the most famous of the latter-day
counterfeiters.” This led to Pete’s wife, who was shacking up with Dr. Mason (a counterfeiting
associate of her husband) in “a rickety, tumble-down cabin” on the outskirts of Neoga,
Ill.<br /><br />
While the couple was away, officers broke into the cabin and “in the loft discovered
a complete kit of counterfeiting tools” and “a number of genuine dies, evidently obtained
through the collusion of some employe of the Mint at Philadelphia, were also there.”
Also found was a counterfeit die for the 1804 dollar. 
<br /><br />
One wonders, however, how this tale connects with the Dission coin. The counterfeit
die for an 1804 dollar can be believed, but Dission’s coin was found to have been
made from a “common” 1808. Problem was, no 1808 U.S. silver dollars were ever minted.
The Mint did strike 1804-dated dollars, beginning in the 1830s. Today, 15 are known.<br /><br />
Check out <i>Fascinating Facts, Mysteries and Myths About U.S. Coins</i> for tales
like the one above:<br /><p></p><a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl061610Z6242">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins</a><p></p><p><br /></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=aaa6d3d5-1e78-48a1-8eac-7eaa41ec30d2" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Who was the American Indian model?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2010/06/10/WhoWasTheAmericanIndianModel.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,2feaf0ad-0554-4cda-8f42-f3f027275a2b.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-06-10T14:44:42.725-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-06-10T16:05:14.377049-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <br />
        <p>
The next issue of <i>Coins</i> magazine (September 2010) will feature an interesting
article by Tom LaMare on the Indian Head gold $5 by Bela Lyon Pratt and the supposed
American Indian model for it and the $2.50.<br /><br />
As with other such stories, not everyone agrees on the model. Some believe it was
Hollow Horn Bear, a Sioux. LaMarre suggests Thundercloud, a Blackfoot. 
<br /><br />
The Buffalo nickel story also suffers from mixed up tales. I cover that one in my
new book, <i>Fascinating Facts, Mysteries and Myths About U.S. Coins<i>. There you'll
also find why Black Diamond may not have been the model for the bison on that popular
coin's reverse. For info on the book see: 
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins/?r=nmnbvrbl030810Z6242">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/fascinating-coins-myths/us-coins</a></i></i></p>
        <p>
          <br />
        </p>
        <br />
        <br />
For info on Coins visit: <a href="http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/coins-magazine-one-year-subscription-us/magazines/?r=nmnbvrbl030810">http://www.shopnumismaster.com/product/coins-magazine-one-year-subscription-us/magazines </a><p></p><p><br /></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=2feaf0ad-0554-4cda-8f42-f3f027275a2b" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A pyramid of the yellow stuff</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2008/08/25/APyramidOfTheYellowStuff.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,821a7cde-0de0-4439-a857-2da9acef31c5.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-25T16:40:40.937-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-25T16:40:40.9378147-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <br />
          <div align="justify">I a couple of months ago I wrote in <i>Coins</i> magazine that
if I had one dream coin it would be the new ultra-high relief Saint-Gaudens gold $20
being released next year by the U.S. Mint. 
<br /><img src="content/binary/IMG_0142.jpg" alt="IMG_0142.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="180" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="240" /><br />
Recently, having attended the American Numismatic Association World’s Fair of Money
in Baltimore, I had a chance to view a U.S.Mint exhibit that included one of the coins.
It was great to be able to see the coin ahead of time, but what I also found interesting
was a stack of six 24-karat gold bars from the West Point Mint, where the new $20s
will be minted. 
<br /><br />
The press information for this portion of the display noted that each bar contained
400 ounces of gold, each weighed 27.5 pounds, each was comprised of newly mined U.S.
gold, and each was worth $384,645 as of the gold spot price on July 22, 2008. Total
value of this pyramid of gold was $2,307,870.<br /><br />
Beside the gold bars, the exhibit showed the process of achieving the ultra-high relief
design and included plasters of the obverse and reverse that could be touched by visitors
to better judge the height of the relief. 
<br /><br />
The coins are likely to go on sale early in 2009 and there is no mintage limit, though
they are slated to be in gold only for that year. Prices haven’t been set yet and
will depend on the price of gold. 
<br /><br />
Gold was above $960 an ounce when the bars were valued for the exhibit. Right now
it’s in the $830 range. So the bars aren’t worth as much as they were when they went
on display, but they are still in worth around $328,000 each.<br /><br />
The original idea behind the heightened relief for the early 20th-century coins, designed
by famed sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens, is credited to President Theodore Roosevelt,
who wanted new designs for the nation’s coins and longed for the dramatic high relief
found on ancient Greek gold coins struck by hand.<br /><br />
However, the Mint ultimately judged it impractical and issued the coin in a much lower
relief. Today the few ultra-high relief patterns that exist are worth in the millions.
More reasonably priced, but valued in the thousands, are the more plentiful high relief
specimens. <img src="content/binary/MMIX_UHR_Obverse.jpg" alt="MMIX_UHR_Obverse.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="140" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="150" /><br /><br />
The new versions are crafted from original plasters that were digitally mapped and
are to be minted in 24-karat gold, which is more malleable than the 22-karat gold
used for the originals. The 27mm planchets for the new coins are about 50 percent
thicker than those used for the American Eagle gold one-ounce coins.<br /><br />
There are some slight design differences as well, including the addition of the motto
“IN GOD WE TRUST,” four more stars to represent the current 50 states, and a small
border not found on the originals. 
<br /><br />
It’s an impressive coin that should prove popular and one I wouldn’t mind owning.<br /></div>
          <br />
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=821a7cde-0de0-4439-a857-2da9acef31c5" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Buffalo nickel a tale of two Big Trees</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2008/06/03/BuffaloNickelATaleOfTwoBigTrees.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,9b473869-dd29-4eb0-87ac-7b1b2a43409d.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-03T11:44:21.246-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-03T11:45:51.8402504-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="justify">Having done plenty of research into the topic of who were the
models for the Buffalo nickel, I'm convinced that Isaac Johnny John (Chief John Big
Tree) was not a model for the coin, despite his claims otherwise. I make my full arguments
in my book <i>Twisted Tails: Sifted Fact, Fantasy and Fiction from U.S. Coin History</i> (Krause
Publications, 1995) and have previously written about the topic for <i>Nu</i><img src="content/binary/cm0514a.jpg" alt="cm0514a.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="181" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="125" /><i>m</i><i>ismatic
News</i>, <i>Coins</i> magazine, and have given a number of speeches on the subject.<br /><br />
I won't go into the details here, but several factors work against his having been
a model for the coin, including a quote from the designer, James Earle Fraser, who
noted that Iron Tail, a Sioux; Two Moons, a Cheyenne; and different Big Tree (Adoeette,
a Kiowa) were the models. Adoeette is shown <img src="content/binary/cm0517a.jpg" alt="cm0517a.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="176" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="177" />here
(at left).<br /><br />
John Big Tree also claimed he was the model for Fraser's famous "End of the Trail,"
statue, which is dubious. There are pictures in our photo archives of him posing before
the statue in Waupun, Wis., in the 1960s—one of which is shown here (at right).<br /><br />
I started my research into the models for the coin believing he was a model for the
coin, having seen John Big Tree on a TV quiz show when I was a kid. He claimed that
Fraser used his forehead and the nose in the design. 
<br /><br />
It wasn't until I started working here at Krause Publications, in the mid-1980s, and
began looking into the claims of another Native American who thought he was the model
(Two Guns White Calf, a Blackfoot) that I began to doubt John Big Tree's claim and
found that another Big Tree was a more likely model.<br /><br />
Even though I don't believe John Big Tree ever modeled for the coin, and r<img src="http://www.numismaticnews.net/flipside/content/binary/1913ab.jpg" alt="1913ab.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="119" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="199" />eally
doubt he had anything to do with the "End of the Trail" statue, for past several years
I've collected many items related to John Big Tree—particularly photographs of him
from his movie days as a bit actor in Western films.<br /><br />
I have two black-and-white photographs of John Big Tree at Glacier National Park,
in Montana, while appearing in one of the last silent films. The photos are somewhat
ironic in that, in 1929, when filming was done, Two Guns White Calf was claiming to
be the model for the Buffalo nickel. For many years after, Two Guns was an attraction
at the park, greeting visitors, signing photographs and being pro<img src="content/binary/cm0523a.jpg" alt="cm0523a.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="172" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="120" />moted
by the Great Northern Railroad as the model for nickel. 
<br /><br />
Unfortunately for Two Guns White Calf, when asked about his claim of being depicted
on the nickel, Fraser denied having used Two Guns' likeness for the coin. Two Guns
White Calf is shown at the left in the image here of two Native Americans. Though
it's hard to make out, he is wearing a medallion with the image of the obverse of
the Buffalo nickel on it. Two Guns died in 1934.<br /><br />
It appears that John Big Tree didn't take up the role until later. Shown here is a
wooden nickel from one of his coin show visits in the 1960s.<br /><br />
One of the more interesting things in my collection is a modern jigs<img src="content/binary/cm0513a.jpg" alt="cm0513a.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="154" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="179" />aw
puzzle by Master Pieces Jigsaw Puzzles. It depicts an artwork by David C. Behrens
titled "Five Cent Peace," which represents as its main image Two Guns White Calf in
profile to the nickel, which is also depicted. Around the nickel are representations
of Iron Tail, Two Moons and Adoeette (Big Tree). "Five Cent Peace" is also available
as a limited-edition print, and I've seen the image on shirts. 
<br /><br />
You can view "Five Cent Peace" and other Native American works by Behrens at his Web
site: <a href="http://www.davidbehrens.com">www.davidbehrens.com</a>. (Incidently,
he uses coins and medals in a number of his works.)
</div>
            <p align="justify">
            </p>
            <br />
            <br />
            <br />
            <br />
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=9b473869-dd29-4eb0-87ac-7b1b2a43409d" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Josh's gold-plated nickel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2008/05/09/JoshsGoldplatedNickel.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,840bf7ea-c168-4d22-bdc4-0fd911ab01d3.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-05-09T09:05:35.094-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-09T09:05:35.0942248-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div align="justify">In next week's episode of "Collecting Money," on Coin Chat Radio,
I plan to do a piece about Josh Tatum and the 1883 Liberty Head nickel.<br /><br />
Tatum, a d<img src="content/binary/cm0633a.jpg" alt="cm0633a.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="151" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="152" />eaf
mute, who reputedly gold-plated thousands of the first Liberty Head nickels and passed
them as gold $5s, probably didn't exist. But Variety 1 1883 Liberty Head nickels were
definitely plated by shysters and tendered as gold $5s. There are numerous contemporary
newspaper reports of attempts to pass the coins as gold $5s. Today collectors call
these coins Racketeer nickels.<br /><br />
A quick search of the <i>New York Times</i> archives turned up an 1883 story datelined
from Baltimore of a jeweler who had a tray of gold-plated Liberty Head five-cent pieces
in his store window that he was selling at 35 cents each. The jeweler claim<img src="content/binary/cm0633b.jpg" alt="cm0633b.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="149" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="152" />ed
the coins were being sold as charms to wear on watch chains.<br /><br />
What made the plating of the coins attractive to fast-buck artists was that the first
1883 pieces carried only a Roman numeral "V" for the denomination. Once it became
evident that this was leading to the plating and passing of the coins at 100 times
their real face value, the Mint redesigned the coin by placing the word "CENTS" below
the Roman numeral for five. These Variety 2 1883 coins actually bring stronger prices
than the Variety 1 1883 coins.<br /><br />
My piece on Tatum, part of a segment called "Collecting Type and Beyond," can be listened
to at <a href="http://www.coinchatradio.com">www.coinchatradio.com</a>. The show will
air beginning at 11 a.m. Central on Thursday, May 15th. It repeats on the main player
at the top of each hour. 
<br /><br />
That show and previous installments of Coin Chat Radio's weekly "Collecting Money"
show can also be accessed under the Archives tab at the site to play at your convenience
or to download.
</div>
          <p align="justify">
          </p>
          <br />
          <br />
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=840bf7ea-c168-4d22-bdc4-0fd911ab01d3" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A pressing concern</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2008/05/01/APressingConcern.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,8c19bed0-1680-4ebd-9b8d-a0fb0a374bed.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-05-01T16:12:29.061-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T16:12:29.0614799-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div align="justify">I ran into this interesting little tidbit that appeared originally
in the Oct. 16, 1873 issue of the <i>Philadelphia North American</i>, while doing
some research. Apparently the introduction of the new Trade dollar, which had been
authorized earlier that year by the Coinage Act of 1873, warranted the building of
a new, more powerful press for use at the San Francisco Mint: 
<br /><br /><blockquote>We were shown yesterday at the works of Messrs. Morgan &amp; Orr, No.
1219, Callowhill Street, the new coining press, just built by them for the purpose
of coining at the San Francisco Mint all denominations of silver and gold coiange,
but especially the new silver trade dollar ordered by the Department of the Mint.<br /><img src="content/binary/cm0937.jpg" alt="cm0937.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="146" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="151" /><br />
This new machine weighs eighteen thousand pounds, and is made entirely of the best
steel, iron, and brass produced in Philadelphia. The steel plate above the coinage
stamp is home-made, and equal, if not superior, to the finest English, a fact that
speaks well for our Philadelphia steel industry. The beautiful heavy brass beam was
cast seven times over to secure its accuracy and exactness, as well as finish and
strength. The large fly-wheel is cast hollow, and loaded with base metal so as to
give it additional weight to counterbalance the heavy brass beam. This fly-wheel was
cast in sections and securely united. In the front of the machine is a finely made
brass cylinder to hold the unstamped coin, which a<img src="content/binary/cm0938.jpg" alt="cm0938.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="148" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="148" />s
the wheel revolves, slip down one at a time upon the sliding bed-plate of iron with
apertures made to receive a single coin, then drawn into the machine, the stamp descends,
and the new trade dollar is carried out complete by an interior inclined plane. The
heavy brass beam referred to of course controls the stamp. Perfect simplicity characterizes
the machine, which is two and a half times beyond the capacity of any other coining
machine that the firm ever made for the government. It is capable of striking eight
twenty-dollar gold pieces, equal to $1,600, per minute, or twenty silver trade dollars
in a minute.</blockquote></div>
          <p align="justify">
          </p>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=8c19bed0-1680-4ebd-9b8d-a0fb0a374bed" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Atrocious designs?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/2008/04/02/AtrociousDesigns.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/PermaLink,guid,1361e6ad-4101-48af-9249-b9a5b48b8b1e.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-04-02T14:56:42.469-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-02T14:56:42.4697504-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bob</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div align="justify">You can't please everybody, and if you're a coin designer you're
sure to attract your share of critics. Today, James Earle Fraser's Buffalo nickel
is considered a classic, but at the time of its release, in 1913, not everyone was
on the Fraser bandwagon.<br /><br />
The <i>New York Times</i>, for instance, complained its March 2, 1913, issue that <img src="content/binary/1913ab.jpg" alt="1913ab.jpg" align="right" border="1" height="148" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="249" />"The
new 'nickel' is a striking example of what a coin intended for wide circulation as
small change should not be." 
<br /><br />
The paper noted that the coins, which had been released the day before by the sub-treasury,
were bringing 10 to 15 cents on the street, "but there will be no great eagerness
to get them hereafter in preference to the old five-cent coins." 
<br /><br />
In fact, the <i>New York Times</i> preferred the Liberty Head nickel. With its large
"V" and the word "Cents," it served its purpose well, the newspaper reported, as those
unfamiliar with the coin could easily tell its denomination. Whereas, on the new nickel,
the lettering was so small that "it can only be deciphered by strong eyes in a bright
light."<br /><br />
More amazingly, perhaps, was the paper's statement that until this new nickel arrived,
the latest "atrocities" from the U.S. Mint were the new gold $5s, $10s and $20s, or
the designs of Bela Lyon Pratt (gold $2.50 and $5) and Augustus Saint-Gaudens (gold
$10 and $20), now highly thought of by collectors. "These are bad coins in design
and execution," the <i>New York Times</i> related.<br /><br />
In its March 5th issue, the newspaper ran a letter from H.P. Nitsua of Connecticut,
who also disliked the new nickel. "Numismatology can hardly be congratulated on the
new recruit to its ranks," he proclaimed.<br /><br /></div>
          <p align="justify">
          </p>
          <br />
          <br />
          <br />
          <br />
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.numismaticnews.net/flipside/aggbug.ashx?id=1361e6ad-4101-48af-9249-b9a5b48b8b1e" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>