Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| December, 2008 (1) |
| November, 2008 (19) |
| October, 2008 (24) |
| September, 2008 (22) |
| August, 2008 (21) |
| July, 2008 (23) |
| June, 2008 (23) |
| May, 2008 (22) |
| April, 2008 (22) |
| March, 2008 (21) |
| February, 2008 (22) |
| January, 2008 (23) |
| December, 2007 (19) |
| November, 2007 (20) |
| October, 2007 (24) |
| September, 2007 (18) |
| August, 2007 (23) |
| July, 2007 (24) |
| June, 2007 (21) |
| May, 2007 (23) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
Search
Archives
More Links
|
 Tuesday, March 11, 2008
CoinChat Radio ready to air
Posted by dave
Preparations for CoinChat Radio are in high gear in the office. The first program will be broadcast online at 11 a.m. Friday morning Central Daylight Time. Mark your calendar. It has been great fun putting it all together. I hope you will be listening to it then or when it repeats at the top of each hour. You can access it at www.CoinChatRadio.com. I do an interview with Texas collector Reed Hawn and talk a little bit about a coin he once owned, an 1804 dollar that will hit the market again at auction in April and the Central States convention. Those who are interested in the precious metals markets will have the opportunity to hear my interview of Pat Heller of Liberty Coin Service. Pat shares his thoughts about gold, platinum and silver. The best part, of course, is if you like what you hear, Pat has agreed to come back. It is a deep subject and in a few minutes in an initial interview, I simply wanted to hear more. I hope you do as well. The program has much more packed into it with contributions by Dave Kranz, Debbie Bradley, Lisa Bellavin and Maggie Pahl and Bob Van Ryzin, who also introduces the rest of us. I don’t want to give it all away. So listen in on Friday. If you do, let me know what you think. Point out the good and the bad. Then all of us can give you more of what you find interesting and useful and less of what you don’t like. My e-mail is david.harper@fwpubs.com.
3/11/2008 8:52:14 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 10, 2008
Back in the office
Posted by dave
Sleep took priority over my blog this morning. I got home about 1:30 this morning, returning from the National Money Show in Phoenix. I was not particularly late. However, at that hour of the morning every extra minute seems to be worth at least two or three. To cover the Krause table until 2 p.m. and then to fly east means a late arrival home no matter what. Had everything gone exactly right, I could not have made it any earlier than 12:30 a.m. So I slept two hours later than usual this morning. What do I think of the goings on in Phoenix? Well, ANA has a new executive direct in Larry Shepherd. Reaction seems very favorable, but it is possible to find one or two dissenters from the majority opinion. The public showed up in force. Many dealers commented on it. Business in general was considered a bit slow. Some blamed the heavy schedule of Las Vegas, Long Beach, Baltimore and then Phoenix on consecutive weekends. Some dealers just didn’t make it to Phoenix as a result. The Tennessee state show kept others away and snowstorms did the rest. Platinum took a header and gold didn’t make it through $1,000, so that prompted a little bit of caution. I did 12 radio interviews for our new CoinChat Radio, which is set to air for the first time on Friday. Perhaps “air” is an archaic term. It is going out online. I hope you get a chance to listen to it. I am sure you will see more about it elsewhere on the Web site. That’s it for now.
3/10/2008 10:49:31 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, March 07, 2008
How sweet it is
Posted by dave
Remember Jackie Gleason? Well, his signature phrase popped into my head here in Phoenix. It is good to be with active hobbyists in a very pleasant setting. Winter won’t give up in Wisconsin. Snow is still piled high. Spring is coming. However it doesn’t take seasonal optimism to be pleased with numismatic business conditions. Nobody knows how long the good times will last, but all of the signs keep pointing to continuing high levels of interest and ever rising prices for truly collectible coins. If you know where inflation is going and how hard any recession might bite, you will have an idea of how long the good times can last. Back in 1979-1980, the boom was called “The Party” by dealers. We don’t seem to have a name for this particular period. When we find one, I hope it will last longer.
3/7/2008 3:24:37 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 06, 2008
On my way to Phoenix
Posted by dave
With silver up nearly a buck yesterday and approaching $21 an ounce in value, it should be interesting to see what the effect might be on bourse activity at the American Numismatic Association National Money Show in Phoenix. As you have probably guessed, I am en route to the show. If the airlines and weather allow, I am due to reach my destination about lunch time. Dealers set up starting at 3 p.m. in the afternoon. In addition to seeing what goes on at the bourse, one of my main purposes will be to cover the ANA board meetings. The good news for me in terms of time spent is that the public meeting lasts just three hours. The bad news is that those three hours are at 3-6 p.m. tomorrow. This will keep me off the bourse floor then. The board has a heavy agenda, including the adoption of the annual budge in public session. In the many private meeting hours, the board was spending all day Wednesday interviewing candidates for the position of executive director. More executive session hours are scheduled for today as well and there will be a town hall meeting Saturday night. Who will want to help straighten out the budget and work to get the ANA out of deficit in future years? That is a key question for the board. This task is daunting enough, but the various lawsuits overhanging the organization make budget projections very difficult if not impossible. The only recourse is massive layoffs or dipping further into the endowment fund. The latter is the likely outcome, and I will be there to watch the public portion of the decision-making process. Any guesses as to just how big the ANA deficit will be?
3/6/2008 9:24:43 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 05, 2008
In the blink of an eye
Posted by Dave
I received an e-mail yesterday about the Dolley Madison First Spouse coins. The writer told me that the Madison uncirculated coin was unavailable from the Mint. That is the first word that I had that the Mint had taken the coin down. It was available Monday when I checked. He is right. It was down when he e-mailed me. I had posted a blog Feb. 26 that noted what I thought was somewhat peculiar. The Madison coins were being offered at prices $90 less than the new Monroe coins when they went on sale Feb. 28. I also wrote a story for last week’s print edition of Numismatic News. For at least four days, the two uncirculated First Spouse designs, Madison and Monroe, were offered. The two proofs have been simultaneously offered at different price levels now for six days. I appreciate reader input. I was initially somewhat baffled by the writer’s line: “Contrary to your online info.” Then I checked. I saw that last week’s print version of the story had magically appeared on the Numismatic News Web site dated March 4. That does raise certain issues when markets are moving fast. Stories are true when they are written for the print edition and when they are posted online. Conditions change. Sometimes they change rapidly. Stories and postings pass into history. There they stand. Some just become obsolete quicker than others. This is the record so far. How long the proof Dolley Madison First Spouse coin will remain on sale more cheaply than the Elizabeth Madison remains an active question. If you are thinking about buying, you might want to make your decision quickly.
3/5/2008 8:58:26 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Cent on way out?
Posted by Dave
With the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln occurring next year and the 100th anniversary mark being attained by the Lincoln cent, there is a lot of talk going on in hobby circles about the lowest current U.S. coin denomination. Its future is rather bleak. Inflation is killing it, aided by changing purchasing habits of Americans. It is far easier to swipe a credit or debit card through the reader and give an electronic signature than it is to count out cash and wait for change. Using cards also eliminates many trips to the bank or ATM to replenish cash walking around money. Since the peak production at the height of the last economic boom in the year 2000, cent production has not ever returned to the approximately 14 billion that were struck in that year. In fact, last year’s production of roughly 7.4 billion cents had actually fallen from the approximately 8.2 billion of the year before. Part of this can be attributed to the slowing economy, but not all of it. In prior cycles, coinage peaks in one cycle were regularly exceeded in the following cycle. Not this time. Americans may be voluntarily abandoning the denomination. Such a death by natural causes is far preferable to political murder. As the Treasury secretary found out Friday when he told a radio program that his personal opinion was he would like to get rid of the cent. The usual howls went up even as he told the same interviewer that it wasn’t politically doable. Why raise the issue at all? Good question. What do you think?
3/4/2008 8:58:36 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 03, 2008
Sounds of silence
Posted by Dave
Silver is trading over $20 an ounce as this is written. Wow. That’s up by more than one-third since the year 2007 ended at $14.797. Gold is not yet at $1,000, but can this milestone be far behind? It began the year at just over $834.90. What’s the Treasury doing about it? Nothing I can see. Should it? That I even ask such a question may be a generational disconnect. It used to be that the Treasury was terribly concerned about the price of precious metals. In the 1960s, the Treasury dumped huge quantities of what had been a 2-billion-ounce hoard of silver to try to maintain its official price of $1.2929. Same with gold. Large amounts went into maintaining the $35-an-ounce figure. The sense of crisis and the public pronouncements all indicated officials considered something amiss. The free market eventually won, but it was treated like a course of castor oil – unpleasant but necessary. Even in 1979-1980, there was a sense of crisis despite the fact that the markets were free. Interest rates were raised to tamp down speculation. One Federal Reserve chairman was pushed out and another, Paul Volcker, was put in his place. Not this time. It’s different. Buyers of gold and silver are starting to sound like buyers of real estate did two years ago. You can’t lose, they say. The similarity is unsettling. That is perhaps why the echoes of the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s are in my ears. They may be part of the past, but are all of their lessons now irrelevant?
3/3/2008 9:03:32 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 29, 2008
Eagle to fly away
Posted by Dave
Sacagawea dollars with the 2008 date are closer to reality, the Mint said yesterday. Both houses of Congress passed a technical amendment that gives the green light to production and sale of the coin. The only thing left now is a Presidential signature. This is expected in a routine fashion. This year is an in-between year. Last year the Congress modified the law and turned the Sacagawea dollar into an annual commemorative of Native Americans. Starting in 2009 and for each year thereafter, the reverse will change to commemorate Native American themes. That left 2008 in legal limbo in the Mint’s opinion and why the congressional action was requested to prevent any possible problems. Collectors now will have more reason to collect the series than a simple date change. In terms of aggregate mintages, the Sac dollar is successful. In terms of usage, it is a curiosity that is primarily reserved for collectors. New designs probably will inspire hobbyists to get reacquainted with the coin. So this year is your last chance to buy the Sac with the flying eagle on the reverse. It’s run is not quite as long as the Standing Liberty quarter, but it is longer than the Flying Eagle cent. Why do the natural looking flying eagles have shorter runs than the formally posed and heraldic eagles? Good question.
2/29/2008 9:01:21 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 28, 2008
Can silver win the race?
Posted by Dave
Silver is spurting toward $20 an ounce. Gold is moving toward $1,000. Which will cross the nice round number first? I don’t know, but today I am leaning to silver. Why? Well, it is one of those peculiar reasons. My firm publishes gold and silver value charts. These list the value of the bullion in various widely owned coins at various market price levels for the precious metals. The current gold value chart tops out in the value listing at $1,200. The silver chart tops out at $20. We have run out of these. The internal mechanism for getting more printed was swinging into motion and I had to pass the word yesterday that the chart needs to be modified otherwise we would be paying production costs for something that looks set to be useless in just a few days. Sure, silver could top out at the $19.21 that it settled at yesterday, but I don’t want to bet company money on that possibility. I would much rather see the new charts run up to the $25 area, and even that could become obsolete soon. Our Federal Reserve chairman is so worried about the banking crisis and the need to cut interest rates, that it appears anyone with any investable funds has decided to take a spin in the commodity casino. Why collect a paltry 3 percent interest from banks or funds that may blow up when you can get huge percentage gains in commodities? Everybody is watching the $100 mark for oil and the metals milestones but fewer are following things like wheat on the Minneapolis market hitting $24 a bushel when not that long ago it was less than $5 and this story seems to be repeating over and over across the board. Coffee has been soaring, too. That of course worries me most of all. What would I do if I couldn’t afford my morning three cups?
2/28/2008 9:01:04 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Worth thinking about?
Posted by Dave
The gold bugs are actively dissecting the news that the International Monetary Fund appears to be in the process of making a decision to sell 12.9 million ounces of gold bullion. Created in 1944 by the Bretton Woods treaty, the purpose of the IMF was originally to help member countries keep their exchange rates fixed by helping keep their trade accounts balanced. This help ranged from advice to loans. Nowadays, where exchange rates are floating and nationalism has caused countries to resent or resist any advice that runs counter to prevailing political passions, the IMF has lost much of its original purpose. It does still lend money and the purpose of the gold sale is to raise some additional lendable funds. What will the extra supply hitting the market do to the price of gold? Not very much, I would think. As long as the Federal Reserve continues to rapidly increase the American money supply, inflation will be a problem and individuals who want a hedge against it will continue to buy gold. It pays to keep in mind that 12.9 million ounces is less than $13 billion. The American money supply, measured at its most basic level, currency in circulation, is nearly $1 trillion and annual economic output is about $14 trillion. This doesn’t even take into account the rest of the world. Put in that light, it is hard to imagine the market having any difficulty absorbing the gold. There are good reasons to buy or sell gold. The IMF’s possible gold bullion sale should not affect any of them.
2/27/2008 8:58:47 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 26, 2008
History has high price
Posted by Dave
What do these numbers have in common? $429.95, $529.95 and $619.95? How about $410.95, $509.95 and $599.95? You probably figured out that these are the issue prices for First Spouse gold coins. The first set of three were the proof coin issue prices. The first proof price was the initial cost of buying Martha Washington, Abigail Adams and Thomas Jefferson Liberty design half-ounce gold coins. The second price was the November cost of the Dolley Madison proof gold coin. The $619.95 is the price buyers will have to pay starting Thursday, Feb. 28, for the Elizabeth Monroe proofs. For the uncirculated coins the sequence is similar. The first three had the lowest price, the fourth issue the middle price and now the fifth issue has a yet higher price. The rising price of gold bullion, which closed at $937.60 an ounce yesterday, is the culprit. The proof price is now more than 44 percent higher than the initial cost while the uncirculated price is 46 percent higher. What will these higher prices do to sales? Already we have seen the Dolley Madison coin not sell out. It was the issue that sported the first price hike. More than three months after sales began, approximately 25,000 of 40,000 possible have been taken. Will Elizabeth Monroe fall further behind? Probably. Not only are rising prices against the issue, so is history. As we get further and further away from the beginning, the novelty wears off and sales tend to weaken. By the time we get to Millard Fillmore’s wife, what kind of demand will there be? For most of us, that will be the first time that we learn that his wife’s name was Abigail. (Yes, I had to look it up.) But that probably will be an insufficient reason to make the purchase.
2/26/2008 9:03:22 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, February 25, 2008
I just can't help it
Posted by Dave
Here I thought I was lucky. For the first time this winter, I successfully transited Chicago O’Hare airport without delay yesterday. But then, to bring the universe back into balance, my office computer this morning was moving very slowly. I guess I should be grateful. It is Monday and slow is better than completely locked up. For me, this week will see me watching the price of silver. I know that platinum is moving like a rocket because of electricity shortages at mines and smelters in South Africa, but silver is in my blood as a coin collector. The Coinage Act of 1965 is not just an historical landmark to me. To my generation of collectors, it was viewed almost as a personal affront. The act dared to take silver away from us. Sure, there were good policy reasons, but the net result was the end of the circulation finds era of coin collecting. It might be argued that had it been the Coinage Act of 1962, I wouldn’t be a coin collector at all. Could I have survived in a period as a kid trying to put a collection together when all there was to find in change was a single date for each denomination? I tend to doubt it. I had a running start of a few years to tide me over until I was earning my own money and could buy pieces from time to time. Had I shelved coin collecting or not attempted it at all, how would my life have gone? Gosh, I might have become a doctor or a lawyer instead of a numismatic writer. Timing is important in this life, especially when something new is being attempted. Coins got into my blood early. Silver was and is a part of it. How is $18 an ounce affecting potential newcomers and potential collectors? Any old pre-1965 silver coin is now worth almost 13 times face value as metal. Timing means a great deal. If this is the time for some individuals to try coin collecting, what are they deciding?
2/25/2008 9:02:53 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
|