Silver is spurting toward $20 an ounce. Gold is moving toward $1,000. Which will cross the nice round number first?

I don’t know, but today I am leaning to silver. Why? Well, it is one of those peculiar reasons. My firm publishes gold and silver value charts. These list the value of the bullion in various widely owned coins at various market price levels for the precious metals.

The current gold value chart tops out in the value listing at $1,200. The silver chart tops out at $20. We have run out of these. The internal mechanism for getting more printed was swinging into motion and I had to pass the word yesterday that the chart needs to be modified otherwise we would be paying production costs for something that looks set to be useless in just a few days.

Sure, silver could top out at the $19.21 that it settled at yesterday, but I don’t want to bet company money on that possibility. I would much rather see the new charts run up to the $25 area, and even that could become obsolete soon.

Our Federal Reserve chairman is so worried about the banking crisis and the need to cut interest rates, that it appears anyone with any investable funds has decided to take a spin in the commodity casino. Why collect a paltry 3 percent interest from banks or funds that may blow up when you can get huge percentage gains in commodities?

Everybody is watching the $100 mark for oil and the metals milestones but fewer are following things like wheat on the Minneapolis market hitting $24 a bushel when not that long ago it was less than $5 and this story seems to be repeating over and over across the board. Coffee has been soaring, too. That of course worries me most of all. What would I do if I couldn’t afford my morning three cups?

The gold bugs are actively dissecting the news that the International Monetary Fund appears to be in the process of making a decision to sell 12.9 million ounces of gold bullion.

Created in 1944 by the Bretton Woods treaty, the purpose of the IMF was originally to help member countries keep their exchange rates fixed by helping keep their trade accounts balanced.

This help ranged from advice to loans. Nowadays, where exchange rates are floating and nationalism has caused countries to resent or resist any advice that runs counter to prevailing political passions, the IMF has lost much of its original purpose. It does still lend money and the purpose of the gold sale is to raise some additional lendable funds.

What will the extra supply hitting the market do to the price of gold? Not very much, I would think. As long as the Federal Reserve continues to rapidly increase the American money supply, inflation will be a problem and individuals who want a hedge against it will continue to buy gold.

It pays to keep in mind that 12.9 million ounces is less than $13 billion. The American money supply, measured at its most basic level, currency in circulation, is nearly $1 trillion and annual economic output is about $14 trillion. This doesn’t even take into account the rest of the world.

Put in that light, it is hard to imagine the market having any difficulty absorbing the gold.

There are good reasons to buy or sell gold. The IMF’s possible gold bullion sale should not affect any of them.

Here I thought I was lucky. For the first time this winter, I successfully transited Chicago O’Hare airport without delay yesterday. But then, to bring the universe back into balance, my office computer this morning was moving very slowly.

I guess I should be grateful. It is Monday and slow is better than completely locked up.

For me, this week will see me watching the price of silver. I know that platinum is moving like a rocket because of electricity shortages at mines and smelters in South Africa, but silver is in my blood as a coin collector.

The Coinage Act of 1965 is not just an historical landmark to me. To my generation of collectors, it was viewed almost as a personal affront. The act dared to take silver away from us. Sure, there were good policy reasons, but the net result was the end of the circulation finds era of coin collecting.

It might be argued that had it been the Coinage Act of 1962, I wouldn’t be a coin collector at all. Could I have survived in a period as a kid trying to put a collection together when all there was to find in change was a single date for each denomination? I tend to doubt it. I had a running start of a few years to tide me over until I was earning my own money and could buy pieces from time to time.

Had I shelved coin collecting or not attempted it at all, how would my life have gone?

Gosh, I might have become a doctor or a lawyer instead of a numismatic writer. Timing is important in this life, especially when something new is being attempted. Coins got into my blood early. Silver was and is a part of it.

How is $18 an ounce affecting potential newcomers and potential collectors? Any old pre-1965 silver coin is now worth almost 13 times face value as metal.

Timing means a great deal. If this is the time for some individuals to try coin collecting, what are they deciding?

I was joking with Coins Magazine editor Bob Van Ryzin the other day. I said, “Do you realize that 46 of the 50 states quarters have now been released. Doesn’t that make you feel old?”

He laughed. What made it funny is our shared memories. We were both at an internal Krause Publications meeting when Bob offered his observations on what the 50 states program would mean for our readers and our future as a numismatic publishing firm.

To say that Bob thought the impact would be big is an understatement. He knew it would be huge and if anyone in that room at the time had any doubt about it, it was dispelled then and there.

Well, here we both are now coming into the home stretch of a 10-year program. Who would have believed it? A decade seemed so long to look ahead. It passed quickly.

I often wonder about all of the state quarter sets started by kids that were left uncompleted as the years passed. Ten, twenty or thirty years from now they will come back to these sets and some will then try to finish them. They will go on to enjoy a fruitful hobby career.

But then that is something Bob expected at our meeting a decade ago and that is no joke.

A new one-ounce silver bullion coin has been introduced by Austria. It features essentially the same design as appears on Austria’s gold Philharmonic series. It is a beautiful and familiar design.

I was able to see the new coins up close at the Austrian Mint booth in Berlin. Unfortunately, I did not buy one. I should have.

I know the coin will soon be as easily available in the United States as the gold pieces are, but I missed my chance at bragging rights, to donate a catalog plate coin, or to be the first person on the block to have one.

I am sure what I could have done with it would have more than made the purchase price well worth the spending. Besides, it would always be one troy ounce of silver. That’s not a bad thing to own these days.

Steve Bieda, a Michigan hobbyist and  member of the state’s legislature wants to crack down on advertisements for questionable coins from questionable countries.

Many collectors would laud his attempt at consumer protection. They see red when coins from the Marshall Islands can’t be redeemed when taken to the Marshall Islands.

However writing law is a tricky thing. It has to apply equally to everybody and to every country. You might want to take aim at one, but you likely will hit unintended targets.

If the news story I read is accurate, the broad brush of the law would make it illegal to advertise that the European Union’s euro was legal tender in Michigan without a disclaimer that it “cannot be exchanged or redeemed at face value for U.S. currency in the United States.”

The five-euro note and the 50 euro cents coin I had left in my pocket when I came back from Berlin are not readily exchangeable for U.S. money for face value though they are legal tender all the same. I know. I spent way too many euros while I was in Germany. The question isn’t legal tender status, it is the cost of using the banking system to make foreign exchange transactions.

The new commemorative two-euro coin introduced by Germany is legal tender, but I wouldn’t want to attempt to exchange one for U.S. currency. That’s why some airports have donor boxes for good causes. It is well known that coins and small bills cannot be redeemed because the fees involved far exceed the face value. Tourists make the best of it and give to good causes as a result.

Some people can be misled by claims of legal tender. That’s not a point I would disagree with. It is sad to think that numismatics would now mark coin related items like we do stepladders.

Perhaps we should ask foreign countries for edge lettering on all of their coins saying, “This cannot be spent in the United States of America.”

How will you spend your tax rebate from the federal government? Will you throw it into your monthly expenses and watch it disappear, or will you set it aside for a special numismatic purpose?

Sure, spouses and significant others will have something to say about how the money gets spent, but the beauty of the rebate is that it is given out on a per person basis.

If your spouse doesn’t like what you intend doing with it, well, they have money, too.

I’m not trying to start a domestic argument. I just wonder if collectors this year can dream a little bit about what they will do with an extra $600.

Part of the freedom of being a hobbyist is to be able to daydream about what should to be acquired next.

For most collectors, a $600 increase to their hobby budget represents a sizable percentage increase, so the sense of possibilities is significant.

The checks are scheduled to arrive in May, so there is plenty of time to think about good uses for the rebate. Even if it ultimately goes to the auto repair shop, the weeks of daydreaming about numismatic uses will make it all worthwhile.