Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2008 (16) |
| October, 2008 (24) |
| September, 2008 (22) |
| August, 2008 (21) |
| July, 2008 (23) |
| June, 2008 (23) |
| May, 2008 (22) |
| April, 2008 (22) |
| March, 2008 (21) |
| February, 2008 (22) |
| January, 2008 (23) |
| December, 2007 (19) |
| November, 2007 (20) |
| October, 2007 (24) |
| September, 2007 (18) |
| August, 2007 (23) |
| July, 2007 (24) |
| June, 2007 (21) |
| May, 2007 (23) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
Search
Archives
More Links
|
 Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Will ins be out or outs in?
Posted by Dave
What do you think of conventional wisdom? That’s a big topic, so let’s apply it only to the American Numismatic Association board of governors election. Tomorrow afternoon we will find out the results. I have my hunches about the results. I have conventional wisdom. I have a professional opinion. But I do not have the results. Depending on who I talk to, the results can go dramatically in either direction in favor of the anti-incumbents or in favor of the incumbents. But I think it is important to see what conventional wisdom says. Conventional wisdom has it that ANA members believe in orderly transitions of power. Vice presidents always succeed the outgoing president. Insofar as this year’s election is concerned, that will hold true. Barry Stuppler, the sitting vice president, will become president. Patti Finner, a sitting governor, will ascend to the vice presidency. Conventional wisdom tends to favor incumbents. They have survived the electoral winnowing process before and will likely survive it again. That would put Gov. Don Kagin back for another term and Gov. Alan Herbert. Both are incumbents. Both are widely known. You can argue the other side. Don Kagin recently was exonerated by the board in a Dwight Manley complaint. While he won, the publicity can’t be counted as a plus. Alan Herbert has lost an election before. He could do it again. However, conventional wisdom says he will be back. That makes a count of four incumbents. For the anti-incumbents, widely known and widely liked candidates have the familiarity factor on their side. Chet Krause and Cliff Mishler come from a long tenure as founders and builders of Krause Publications, my current employer. They are both well known to the ANA electorate. Former ANA president and executive director Ed Rochette is also widely known and widely liked. A fourth candidate for this slate, Walter Ostromecki, is widely known and widely talked up by anti-incumbents because he has the distinction of being the first governor to be voted off the board. There is a huge electoral element in the sentiment to correct the present board’s action to toss him off the board. That puts the new board at a 4-4 tie. This is not exactly a sweeping victory for either side. Conventional wisdom can argue the final board member either way. Arthur Fitts, a former governor whose wife currently is retiring from a seat, is viewed as part of the incumbent group. He might provide the fifth vote and a majority for incumbents. Joe Boling, who is currently chief judge, might provide the fifth vote on the other side. He is widely known as a hard worker and he has done an outstanding job as chief judge. Will that be enough? It could be. Boling on the board would be the fifth vote for the anti-incumbents. What will happen? I still don’t know, but I have, I hope, explained conventional wisdom.
7/24/2007 9:01:54 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, July 23, 2007
Nickname for coin or for congressmen?
Posted by Dave
One day last week I was handed my 88 cents in change from lunch at the Crystal Cafe. As is my habit, I checked the coins handed to me. There were three quarters, a dime and three cents. The denominations were nothing special. One of the cents caught my eye. It was a Canadian cent. Living in Wisconsin as I do, Canadian coins are not unknown. They can’t be used in vending machines, but somehow or other, they often show up in change. Canadian fishing trips have been a popular pastime for people around Iola for many years. Canadian coins come back with them. They find their way into commerce. Technically, the coins are not legal tender in the United States, but people don’t usually behave on the basis of technicalities. Even with the portrait of Queen Elizabeth II on the coins, there is a certain familiarity to them. Canada has a cent, a five-cent piece, a 10-cent coin, a 25-cent coin and a 50-cent piece. Just don’t call them by their American nicknames. Dimes, quarters and halves just don’t cut it north of the border. It isn’t because Canadians don’t like nicknames. They are fond of them for the $1 coin that depicts a loon. Not surprisingly it is called a “Loonie.” Americans probably could call their $1 coins by the same nickname, but most would think the name would refer to the congressmen who keep authorizing the denomination. The Canadian $2 coin is called a “Twoonie,” the latter is difficult to remember how to spell, but it rhymes with Loonie. The $1 and $2 coins circulate readily in Canada, but they don’t find their way to Iola. It is probably because Americans still don’t know what to make of them. We prefer our paper money, but Canada has not had a paper $1 for 20 years and the paper $2 disappeared more than 10 years ago. Did I think all this as I got my change? Nah. Actually, all that crossed my mind that day was that I was losing much less than I used to by accepting the coin. The Canadian dollar has been on roll in recent years and it is almost back to even with the U.S. currency, but that’s a story for another day.
7/23/2007 8:59:57 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, July 20, 2007
To what rite do proof sets belong now?
Posted by Dave
Proof sets went on sale yesterday. I wonder if this is considered a rite of passage as it was when I ordered my first proof set at the age of 13. There are similarities and differences. I ordered the 1969 proof set by mail just before the Nov. 1, 1968, opening of sales. Nowadays online and telephone orders are quicker and more convenient. The 1969 set was still a novelty. Proof sets had been abolished for 1965-1967 and only in 1968 did they make a comeback. They took a new form. They were in a rigid plastic holder rather than the polyester film packet. The coins had mintmarks. This was only the second year where that was true. They also had a high price: $5. Collectors have long memories and they were still comparing them to the $2.10 issue price of 1964. There was also a speculative component. The 1968 proof set was doing rather well on the secondary market at the time, so would-be buyers sensed potential profits. There are new elements to this year’s set, too. It is the first to include the four Presidential dollars. It also includes the Sacagawea dollar, five state quarters, a half dollar, dime, nickel and cent, making 14 coins in all. That’s a big set. It takes three plastic holders to contain them all. The 1969 set was just one. The price is also pretty big, though I have not heard anyone complain yet: $26.95. Put in perspective, that price is almost identical to the 1969 set in inflation-adjusted terms. You have to divide current prices by roughly 5 to get an approximation. With the 1969 set, the issue price was 5.49 times the 91 cents face value. The 2007 set is 3.90 times the $6.91 face value. By this measure, the current proof set is actually cheaper than the 1969 set. All of these thoughts and more can go through the heads of potential buyers. The new coins add novelty. The fact the Presidential dollars are in the first year of issue add the speculative component. I wonder, though, if that same sense of anticipation grips the buyer as he places his order? I hope so. That is a part of what has kept me in coins for the almost 39 years since my first proof order was mailed.
7/20/2007 9:03:23 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, July 19, 2007
No snooze alarm for us
Posted by Dave
Wake up. Summer is about to end. The seasonal slowdown where dealers can take month-long vacations and not miss much business is winding up. At 1 p.m. the July 31 issue of Numismatic News goes off to the printer in Shawano (electronically, of course) and my attention turns to the Aug. 7 issue, which is the special issue for the American Numismatic Association summer convention called the World’s Fair of Money. This issue of Numismatic News and this convention, which will be held Aug. 8-12 in Milwaukee, Wis., traditionally signal the beginning of the seasonal autumn pickup in business. Adding to the fun, today is the deadline for the receipt of ballots by the accounting firm in the ANA election. BiggsKofford of Colorado Springs, Colo., then has until July 24 to communicate the results to the ANA president and executive director. They in turn inform the current board and all of the candidates. If the plan holds, I will find out the results no later than Wednesday morning, July 25. That is in time for the front page of the ANA issue, which is where I will put the story. The results will also be posted here on my blog. It has been an interesting electoral contest. If you want to know the ANA election results, let’s get together Wednesday afternoon right here. It could be sooner, but remember Colorado time is an hour earlier than Wisconsin time.
7/19/2007 9:00:22 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, July 18, 2007
We can all escape
Posted by Dave
I had a letter on Monday from a fellow who wrote that he had just checked himself into a nursing home. He is 72. He began reading Numismatic News and he found it both interesting and an escape from his daily concerns. I am both sad and happy to get such a letter. I am sad because the writer is in a physical situation that I cannot help with. I am happy that he finds Numismatic News to be a pathway to escape from his daily situation and to offer a constructive diversion. The diversion part is something I can help with. We collectors find the hobby so intellectually stimulating and the search for coins so challenging that it does indeed help us escape for a while from our daily cares. People with hobbies benefit in all aspects of their lives from this effect. The benefits can take many forms. If it gets the collector’s mind off worries, or stress, it probably lowers his or her blood pressure and improves his or her heath and disposition. If a collector makes astute purchases, it can aid him financially. If he happens to learn something from history, his mind is improved and he becomes a better all-around person. Coin collecting is not a cure all, but it does have the power to make life better. It offers goals that each collector alone sets for himself. Success is defined as each collector defines it. Satisfaction comes from having control of something and constructively utilizing the responsibility. I wrote a note to the letter writer thanking him for his kind words and answering his question. Oh yes, he did have a question. If that doesn’t make him a typical collector, I don’t know what does.
7/18/2007 9:00:04 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 17, 2007
No basis for suspicions
Posted by Dave
It shouldn’t surprise me but it does that some readers think that the recent spate of Presidential dollar errors was created on purpose by the Mint. Any manufacturing process has a rate of error. Striking coins is a manufacturing process. For a process that has been around a while, the rate of error is fairly low. That is true of the Mint, but because the Mint strikes 15 billion coins or so a year, even a tiny error rate translates into rather large numbers of errors, though most are minor. When a new manufacturing process is introduced, the error rate is much higher. Adding edge lettering to the Presidential dollar coins is a new manufacturing process. It is no surprise that there are a number of errors generated by it. When the creation of a coin like the Presidential dollar involves two manufacturing processes to reach the final struck state, the number of errors rises by the combined error rates of the two manufacturing processes. Even if the Mint has the best quality control in the world, stuff just happens. Once Presidential dollars are struck and are ready to be sent out to the banking system, if a few have no edge lettering, or twice-applied edge lettering, it is virtually impossible to catch with a visual inspection. It makes me feel old just to look at a Presidential dollar’s edge. The lettering is tiny and rather shallow. Imagine trying to find mistakes amid hundreds of thousands of coins moving by at once. This is not an easy task. I know the suspicions will not go away. I can’t change that. What I can do though is write that there doesn’t yet seem to be any Presidential dollar errors that seem to have been “helped” along as was the case with the Sacagawea dollar when its production began. It also pays to remember that it was the error hobby itself that pointed out to the Mint that some of those Sac errors, the mules specifically, would be impossible without some kind of inside help. The error hobby proved to be right and the Mint had to scramble to prosecute the employees involved. I will watch those who are active in the study of errors and my actions will be guided by theirs. So far, things look clean. Let’s enjoy the publicity we get as a hobby from the errors.
7/17/2007 8:52:14 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, July 16, 2007
Sales start tomorrow
Posted by Dave
Ready, set, go! The Mint begins sales of the proof platinum American Eagle coins and the “W” mintmarked uncirculated American Eagle coins tomorrow at noon Eastern Daylight Time. I was given 25 hours notice. The proofs have limited mintages and the “W” uncirculated coins do not. This year’s reverse design honors the Executive Branch of government. Price of the proof one-ounce coin is $1,599.95 each. Mintage limit is 6,000 individual pieces and another possible 10,000 will be sold in the proof four-coin platinum American Eagle set. The half-ounce proof is $809.95 and has a mintage limit of 5,000 plus another 10,000 in the set. The quarter ounce is $439.95 and has a mintage limit of 5,000 individual coins plus another 10,000 in the set. For the tenth-ounce, the price is $229.95. Mintage is 10,000 plus another 10,000 in the four-coin proof set. The full four-coin proof set is $2,949.95. Prices for the “W” uncirculated coins are a bit less expensive. The one-ounce coin is $1,489.95. For the half ounce, the price is $759.95, the quarter ounce is $399.95 and the tenth ounce is $189.95. The full four-coin “W” uncirculated set is $2,769.95. There are no maximum mintages for the “W” platinum American Eagles. Visit the Mint Web site at www.usmint.gov. By phone, the order number is (800) USA-MINT.
7/16/2007 2:32:37 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Detectives they're not
Posted by Dave
Spain has committed an act of war against Panama. Did you miss it on the news? Last Thursday a Spanish patrol ship intercepted the vessel, the Ocean Alert owned by Odyssey Marine Exploration, in international waters after it had left the port of Gibraltar. The ship is registered in Panama and by marine law is the affronted party. Coin collectors are interested because this is the latest salvo in a fight about sunken treasure. On May 17 Odyssey Marine announced that it had found the treasure, but did not identify the lost ship. Spanish authorities are seething because they figure a plot is afoot to grab treasure from an old Spanish warship to which it has rights under international law. It uses as its evidence photos of coins that seem to show Spanish or Spanish colonial 8 reales coins. As collectors know, that is pretty flimsy, but greed knows no bounds. Spanish coins were the international currency of the world in the 17th and 18th centuries. Through its colonies its mines produced vast silver supplies that colonial mints poured forth as coins and sent back to Spain. The coins were so common, that they were the currency of choice for the 13 colonies that declared their independence from England in 1776. Colonial paper currency promised to pay Spanish milled dollars and the basis of the U.S. dollar was the Spanish milled dollar, which is the 8 reales. The United States melted and assayed the 8 reales to determine what the U.S. dollar should be. Because they were off slightly, the U.S. dollar was just a tad lighter than the Spanish version. Collectors know just because Spanish coinage is present on a ship doesn’t make the ship Spanish. Is it surprising that Odyssey Marine would want to keep its find’s location secret? Well, if you find something of great value in international waters and you cannot anchor a security force there 24 hours a day, what would you do? Spanish authorities have already sued the company over the matter, but apparently the legal process is not fast enough. Perhaps the U.S. government can start seizing hoards of U.S. currency wherever they are found in the world under the supposition that they must be originally stolen from us somewhere. Oh, these notes circulate freely around the world? Tell that to the Spanish government about its historic coins.
7/16/2007 9:06:49 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, July 13, 2007
Rain not complete washout
Posted by Dave
You know what? You can run into coin collectors even in a downpour at the Iola Old Car Show. And I don’t mean fellow Krause Publications staff members. I was about an hour into my volunteer shift yesterday afternoon selling Old Cars subscriptions and CD’s when the heavens decided to open up on us. The nearby Duesenberg had already been driven to cover, heading for the Krause garage in the early sprinkle stage of the inclement weather because hail was possible and with a $1 million car, you don’t want hail damage. The car’s normal location was an open-sided tent near an outside table at which I was working. When the rain hit, there were seven or eight of us taking shelter in the Ultimate Garage Giveaway garage when we were joined by a another drenched passerby. He was a recent high school grad down with his father, uncle and brother from the nearby city of Wausau. They had a car in the Car Corral. The grad, it turns out, was a coin collector. He had collected Wheat cents, Canadian coins, state quarters, some euro coinage and a number of pieces from Guatemala. It was the kind of material that many a hobbyist has started out with. Alas, the state quarters were no more. He, like many young collectors, ended up spending them when he needed money. But the collecting bug has bitten him and it likely will be back more virulent than ever someday as is the pattern with many a collector who started in childhood. He also has an interest in stamps, postcards and some items that I will lump under the heading of bric-a-brac. With his interests in history and graphic arts, perhaps he has a future in numismatic publishing. In 10 minutes or so the rain let up and he was on his way. Unfortunately, I didn’t sign him up for the Ultimate Garage Giveaway.
7/13/2007 8:57:58 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, July 12, 2007
Thank you, Chet Krause
Posted by Dave
I put on an orange arm band this morning. No, it is not some weird pre-pre-Orange Bowl ritual that I have or a tribute to William of Orange of the Netherlands who became King William of England, who is either revered or hated in Northern Ireland every July, depending on which side is being considered. It is, rather, Old Cars orange and I have been drafted into the Old Car Show helpers brigade to sell subscriptions to a sister publication to Numismatic News, Old Cars Weekly. This product was acquired and renamed by Chet Krause in 1972 for two compelling reasons. The first reason was that Chet happened to like old cars and had a great interest in the field. The second reason was more important. In the coin market downturn that followed the roll and bag boom after its 1964 peak, Chet nearly lost his business. The revenue at Numismatic News and Coins Magazine were in a relentless downward spiral and employees used to be a part of the Friday pink slip lottery, which you did not want to win because it meant you were laid off. To save his business, Chet stopped drawing a salary and was using the proceeds of sales of his personal coin collection to stay afloat personally and the business professionally. As you know, Krause Publications survived and went on to thrive. The key was hobby diversification. Chet vowed to move into other fields. His interests were so wide ranging that he was good at picking winners. When his own experience was lacking, his trusted staff guided him to big winners, such as Bob Lemke and Doug Watson suggesting the sports card field. Old Cars was the breakthrough, though. Chet hitched his star professionally to the field and Iola, Wis., came along for the ride. The Iola Lions Club had an annual chicken fry. Chet invited a few car friends to bring their cars in 1972 and soon the car portion took over. The Lions still sell chickens, but there are more than 50 other civic organizations serving an expected 140,000 people over four days. I will spend two days cooking hamburgers for the Lions this weekend. The profits all go to charity. It has benefited Iola enormously. Thanks, Chet.
7/12/2007 9:10:15 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, July 11, 2007
New book, new twist
Posted by Dave
I had a phone call from Scott Travers late yesterday afternoon. I have known Scott for many years and we have worked together on Numismatic Literary Guild matters together. There was NLG business associated with the call, but the major news was he has written a new book. It is called Scott Travers’ Top 88 Coins to Buy and Sell. It was released yesterday. It is a clever book. What makes it different from the usual books with lists is that it divides the field equally between good coins to buy and coins that should be avoided. There are 44 good coins and 44 bad coins. The usual lists are the top 10 coins to buy now, or the greatest 100 coins ever struck and things of that nature. Well, Scott has taken a different path. I have seen a sample of one of the bad coins. It is the 1933 Saint-Gaudens gold $20. Only one is legal to own and that was purchased by an anonymous buyer for $7.59 million. Since that transaction, 10 more have been confiscated by the U.S. Mint from the family of Israel Switt, a Philadelphia jeweler, who is no longer living. The government says these coins are illegal to own because they were never officially released. Quite naturally, at least in the eyes of collectors, the family is taking the opposite position and a lawsuit is proceeding to adjudicate the matter. Neither Scott nor I know what the court will eventually decide, but he quite correctly points out that the mere existence of the 10 seized coins gives great credibility to the hobby rumors that more exist and they could be outside the country beyond the power of the U.S. Secret Service to grab them. These rumored coins will tend to depress any future price that a buyer would be willing to pay for the only legal 1933 should it ever come up for sale again. There is sound reasoning there. Would you want to buy something at a great price if you thought a large new supply was just waiting in the wings? I sure wouldn’t. Scott got my attention. I bet he can get yours, too. I can’t wait to read about the other 87 coins in the book. The book is a House of Collectibles paperback. It is priced at $13.95.
7/11/2007 9:02:57 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 10, 2007
This meeting was planned
Posted by Dave
One of the great pleasures of travel on the numismatic circuit is the opportunity to meet people.  Most encounters are of a serendipitous nature. I don’t know who I will run into and that makes things interesting and exciting. It is a little like a lottery of life. My recent trip to the Memphis paper money show featured such encounters, but there was also a planned one. I was looking forward to meeting Mart Delger’s wife of 52 years. He has been the chairman of exhibits at Memphis since the very first one in 1977, but in all that time, he has never been joined there by his wife. This year it was different. He mentioned to me beforehand that she would be there to see what all the fuss was about. She has been the behind-the-scenes helper to make sure the exhibit process moved smoothly. She has typed many lists of participants. I have been the beneficiary of that effort as I publish them in Bank Note Reporter. My mission on Friday after the ribbon cutting that opened the show was to find Mart and meet his wife. It was a great pleasure to meet Chris. Her full name is Christal, but she is called by the more informal nickname. I asked her why after all these years did she decide to come to Memphis. “I decided I ought to,” she said with a smile. “I’ve never been to this one.” She has been to other shows, though. She looked at Mart and said, “I’d better stand by this man.” I thanked Chris for having made it possible for me to work with Mart for so many years. She was going to have a busy day. I wasn’t the only one who wanted to meet her. “I hear all the names,” she said. She spent the convention connecting them to a set of faces, mine among them. I hope to see her again in Memphis next year. I don’t think I’m alone in that wish.
7/10/2007 9:06:55 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|